• Home
  • Sitemap
Subscribe: Posts | Comments | E-mail
  • Babblings (Acts 17:18)Stephen Vantassel's brief thoughts on theology, society and unusual or bizarre religiosity.
  • Bible Translation ThoughtsViews on Translation Studies and Linguistics.
  • Biblical Archaeology NewsPopular treatment of and comment on the latest biblical archeology discoveries.
  • Calvin L. SmithComment by KEDS Principal Calvin Smith
  • ProvocateurProvocative thoughts with a philosophical twist from Chris Lazenby.
  • Salt and LightNews, notes, and guidance for Christians seeking to be salt and light in society.
  • The Church and IsraelA Christian response to the Jews, modern Israel and supercessionism within the Church

King’s Evangelical Divinity School Blog

Posted on December 25, 2009 - by Stephen Vantassel

Dialogue with Animal Protectionists?

Babblings (Acts 17:18)

One of the hallmarks of contemporary culture is the naive notion that dialogue can conquor all disputes. You hear this sort of nonsense all time, i.e. If we could communicate better we would be able to resolve our differences. The fact is dialogue only works with people who share a sufficient number of values to allow compromise (unless of course, one side capitulates). A classic counter example to the belief that dialogue can resolve all disputes, is the Israel-Palestinian conflict. Does anyone really believe that both sides don’t understand each other?

It seems to me that both parties understand each other all too well, that is why they are fighting so much. Both sides disagree at such a fundamental level that compromise is unlikely. I suggest that the same idea pervades certain animal protectionists who regularly call for “dialogue” regarding the use of animals.

Dialogue is most successful when there is truly a misunderstanding between parties. Otherwise, if there isn’t a misunderstanding and compromise is not possible, then dialogue will do little more than provide more reasons why the two parties cannot agree.

Despite their calls for dialogue, I have never been asked to speak at one of their meetings. I was asked to attend a local debate, but never dialogue or engage them on a larger level. It seems to me that if a group is regularly asking for dialogue that one should expect said group to actually be reaching out and trying to initiate it.

I suggest that dialogue is only worthwhile when parties commit to outlining their agenda, make public their presuppositions, and speak honestly. If this isn’t possible, then dialogue is little more than a politically correct waste of time.

I have written more on this topic in an article entitled, “The ethics of wildlife control in urbanized landscapes: A Response.” It and other publications of mine on the animal rights movement is available from my website.

Stephen M. Vantassel is tutor of theology at Kings’s Evangelical Divinity School.

Copyright 2009 Stephen M. Vantassel

This entry was posted on Friday, December 25th, 2009 at 10:25 pm and is filed under Babblings (Acts 17:18). You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

2 Comments

We'd love to hear yours!



  1. Visit My Website

    January 4, 2010

    Permalink

    Peter said:

    Hello Stephen, I thought of you before singing evensong to-night. The introit was ‘O magnum mysterium’, music by Victoria.

    Unlike me, you probably have wonderful latin. But just in case we are similar in this, here is a translation which I copied.

    ‘O most awesome mystery
    and sacrament divine and most wondrous:
    that animals should look and see the Lord a babe newborn
    beside them in a manger laid.
    O how truly blessed is the Virgin whose womb was worthy
    to bear and bring forth the Lord Christ Jesus.’

    Happy New Year

    Peter



  2. Visit My Website

    January 9, 2010

    Permalink

    Stephen Vantassel said:

    All of God’s creation is to glorify Christ in accordance to their ability, just as I do when I eat, watch, trap, etc. animals.



Leave a Comment

Here's your chance to speak.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    • Wycliffe Bible Translators - UK 50th Anniversary
    • Israel and the Church: A Common Heritage and Uncertain Future (8-9 Oct, London)
    • “It’s Human Nature, Stupid!”
    • New Edition of the Chicago Manual of Style
    • LIVE THE WORD?
  • Recent Comments

    • DavidF on Keswick 2010; the dumbing down of Christian music
    • Chris Lazenby on Were you one of them?
    • Chris Lazenby on Genuine Fake Watches
    • Peter on Equality….
    • Keith Waters on It’s only a bit of paper
  • Events Calendar

    September 2010
    Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
       
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    27282930  
  • Archives

  • Links

    • Archbishop Cranmer
    • Beginning With Moses
    • Calvin Smith’s blog
    • Calvin Smith’s website
    • Chosen People Ministries
    • Christianity Today
    • Church at the Gateway
    • Daniel Pipes
    • Darrell Bock
    • Evangelical Review of Society and Politics
    • Julian Spriggs
    • King’s Evangelical Divinity School
    • Larry Helyer
    • Pulpit Ministries
    • Seismic Shock
    • Stephen Vantassel
    • Talks With Scholars
    • The Church and Israel
    • The Ugley Vicar
    • Tyndale House
  • Log-in

    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.org
  • Categories

    • An Englishman in…
    • Babblings (Acts 17:18)
    • Bible Translation Thoughts
    • Biblical Archaeology News
    • Calvin L. Smith
    • Provocateur
    • Salt and Light
    • Student Stuff
    • The Church and Israel
    • Uncategorized
© 2008 King’s Evangelical Divinity School Blog - (formerly Midlands Bible College blog). Comment and blogs by King’s faculty.